TDN
Associated Press
September 2nd, 2010

Police in the Portland suburb of Tigard say a husband and wife were found fatally shot at an apartment complex in an apparent murder-suicide.

Officers found the bodies of 34-year-old Jeffrey Njus and 31-year-old Ilona Njus outside an apartment in a breezeway Tuesday night at the Arbor Heights Apartments.

Police say the woman’s mother told officers she saw the man shoot her daughter, then turn the gun on himself.

The couple’s 2-year-old daughter was found sleeping unharmed in the apartment. Lt. Erick Boothby says state caseworkers have placed the child with the woman’s mother.

Police and friends say the couple had recently separated.

___

Information from The Oregonian, KPTV-TV

Lowri Turner
Daily Mail Online
June 13th 2008

When did it become acceptable to be a gold-digger?

After all, isn’t a woman who sleeps with a man for money – or at least for extensive use of his credit card – called something else?

But then, ‘prostitute’ doesn’t have quite the same glamorous, diamond-encrusted platinum ring to it, does it?

A new French film opens in the UK this week called Priceless.

It tells the story of a woman who selects her mates entirely on the basis of the size of their wallets.

Who needs sexual chemistry when you can have cold hard cash?

Audrey Tautou is predictably Gallic and gamine in the lead role, but underneath the pretty tousled hair and shiny Chanel handbags, the message is an ugly one.

A man exists not as an equal partner in a kind, loving, relationship, but merely as someone to be fleeced for as much money as possible.

How depressing and how insulting to the millions of women who don’t live their lives according to these mercenary rules.

While we are the majority, the sad fact is, we are all judged as a result of movies like this.

It makes us all look cheap. Priceless cannot be blamed alone.

The message it delivers is one that has been subtly gaining currency in recent times and not just on film.

A string of high-profile divorce cases – most notably that of Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, where she walked away with £24 million, but also that of Susan Sangster, who amassed a fortune of £18 million from three marriages (before ex-husband number four successfully got a judge to call a halt to her divorce trolley dash) – contribute to the growing view that women are for sale and men are to be used as human cashpoints.

There is also, of course, the whole WAG phenomenon, predicated almost entirely on a cynical pact between rich, bored, badly behaved men (Ashley Cole comes to mind) and the women who want to live off them.

The gaggle of wannabe WAGs hovering outside any nightclub frequented by Premier League footballers is proof that there is an increasing number of women who believe that far from having their own life and their own job, the notion of being a human leech is to some degree a preferable career.

As evidence that bleeding a man dry is on the up, there is now a fashion label called Golddigga and even websites such as www.golddiggers. uk.com, devoted to ways of hooking a rich guy.

Click on www.sugardaddyforme.com and the deal being struck is clear.

A glamorous-looking young woman appears on the screen. ‘Attractive, ambitious, insatiable,’ it reads.

In other words, she’s offering sex on tap. When the picture of the tastefully greying man floats into view, it says: ‘Affluent, caring, generous.’

Yet, we’re not supposed to call these women prostitutes. That would be rude.

But the line between the girl who asks for cash up front and the one who is taken to a designer boutique to choose the latest handbag is surely now as thin as the strap on a La Perla push-up bra.

I write as someone who could have taken the gold-digger route on two occasions.

On the first, I met a chap on a plane. He was sitting next to me in business class. We chatted politely and then the subject moved to shopping. ‘I like to buy nice things for ladies,’ he said.

I noted the plural.

‘Would you like me to take you shopping when we land?’ he asked.

That was too naked a business deal for me, which was what I presumed he would expect in return, so I declined. On the second occasion, I met a man at a very posh party. He dealt in diamonds.

He was persistent and persuasive and, in the end, I agreed to have dinner with him.

When he arrived, his chauffeur gave me a look as I got in which said: ‘So, you’re the new one?’

At the restaurant, the maitre d’, who clearly knew my date well, did the same thing.

Before the starter had even been served, my dinner partner took a small packet out of his pocket, carefully unwrapped it and slid something across the table, with the words: ‘So what does it take to become your lover?’ I looked down and saw it was a diamond.

I could have taken it. I didn’t. I felt insulted, cheapened. I pushed it back across the table.

Looking back, I should have walked out, butthe whole episode felt so surreal that I didn’t feel fully enraged until afterwards and a small part of me also thought it would, perhaps, be rude to walk out.

But a growing number of women would slip that diamond straight in their handbag.

Let’s not get this out of proportion.

Of course, it is still only a tiny percentage of women that would dream of behaving like this; it’s just that percentage – which is rising – think what they do is so acceptable. Listen to Sophie Sharp, a dancer from Bromley in Kent, who says: ‘I’ve always been into expensive clothes and accessories and think nothing of paying £400 for a dress.

But on my earnings it was hard to afford everything I wanted.’ Well, um, yes it would be. Still, Sophie’s solution was not to visit Primark but to get herself a sugar daddy instead. ‘My friends told me to go to Chinawhite (the fashionable club in London),’ she reveals.

So she put on her best low-cut black frock and, hey presto, she’d hooked herself a Dubai businessman. ‘I didn’t find him attractive,’ she admits.

Even so, she accepted his offer to take her shopping.

A total of £2,500 later, she says, he flew back to Dubai with nothing more than a chaste peck on the cheek in return, to which it’s tempting to say, is a likely story.

Sophie’s current sugar daddy is a personal trainer with a celebrity client list. He runs a chain of gyms.

He has given her a one-bedroom house of her own near Bromley and presented her with a brand new £18,000 Toyota MR2 sports car just two months after meeting her.

They do have sex, and she says: ‘I love him,’ although whether she’d love him if he was a street sweeper is an open question.

In Sophie’s world, being a golddigger is par for the course. All Sophie’s friends are doing the same.

‘I have friends who are dating rich men just to get designer clothes and jewellery, and one who was seeing a 50-year-old just so he would pay for her to have breast implants,’ she says.

Rachel MacLynn is head of global membership for millionaires-only networking service Seventy Thirty.

‘There are gold-diggers everywhere in London and other British cities. I’m constantly approached by young women,’ she says.

‘They are desperate for me to match them with our millionaire members.

‘One posh girl in her early 30s approached me at a swish members club in West London and said she’d be willing to date any man up to the age of 80.

‘ What’s interesting about the new breed of gold-digger is that they tend to be well-educated and come from good families.

Jess Kent, 23, a promotional assistant, is the daughter of a surgeon and a teacher from Northampton. She was just 17 when she told her parents she was flying to the Mediterranean for a modelling job. In fact, she had arranged a liaison with her 52-year-old boyfriend, who spent a small fortune with her at the roulette tables in Monte Carlo.

Or what about Natalie Parker, 24, who’s studying French and Spanish at university in Southampton? Her parents – a property developer and a housewife – live in a four-bedroom, four-bathroom house with a gym and a pool in Spain.

‘I’ve always dated wealthy men, even though I’ve not really been attracted to them,’ Natalie muses.

So, has she ever had to offer sex with a sugar daddy to secure a lavish gift?

‘Some of these men do want more at the end of the night,’ she concedes, without actually answering the question.

It is worth saying that the men are not blameless in this unpleasant sex for designer clothes/ jewellery/breast implants transaction. A man who buys a woman is no better than the woman who agrees to sell herself. It all reduces human interaction to the level of a business deal.

Still, it is the women’s attitudes that are so shocking. It’s as if feminism never happened. Did it ever occur to Sophie or Heather or all the other young women who now aspire to be golddiggers, that they could work to provide a life for themselves rather than just expect a guy to buy it for them?

Looking further ahead, do these girls know the sort of deal they are doing? They are not only throwing away any moral sense, but also their independence, control of their own lives and self-respect.

If the deal is sex for money, the man with the cash may decide to go shopping himself elsewhere.

In Priceless, Audrey Tautou is locked out of her hotel room by one wealthy lover, leaving her standing shivering in a bikini. In the real world, a relationship where there is such an imbalance of power, where one partner has basically bought the other, might just about work if things go well.

But if Mr Rich tires of Ms Golddigger, he simply trades her in for a younger, firmer rival.

I didn’t take the gold-digger route because I think it is wrong. It is insulting to men and it cheapens women. Every woman who does it polishes an image of womankind that the rest of us then have to try to argue against.

It makes us all look as if we are for sale for the price of a pair of Gucci shoes. I have lost count of the number of conversations I have had with men where they have said that basically all a woman is interested in is how much money they have and the size of their car.

When I explain that I have never dated a man for his money, nor have any of my girlfriends, that we have jobs and homes of our own and we wouldn’t dream of expecting a boyfriend to provide either, they look at me with disbelief.

The image of womanhood that the gold-digger propagates is one of a greedily acquisitive airhead. She never reads a book or a newspaper, but knows the ticket price for the latest designer handbag.

Consumption replaces affection.

Her diamante sandals may be lovely and sparkly, but she tarnishes all of us.

Additional reporting: Sadie Nicholas.

CBS 2 Chicago
August 16th, 2010

OAK LAWN (CBS) — Do orders of protection work for victims of domestic violence?

Police say an Oak Lawn woman had one and now she’s dead.

Bernadette Huladek feared her husband — especially after hearing about another murder-suicide in Chicago Ridge, just days before she was killed.

Three weeks ago, family members say John Huladek was jailed for threatening to kill his wife.

An order of protection was filed against him, and he was forbidden from returning to his Oak Lawn home.

But after posting 10 percent of a $40,000 bond, he was released.

Then late last week, police say he armed himself and shot his wife when she went outside to take out the garbage.

He then killed himself.

“She said that could have been me. And two days later it was,” said Bernadette Huladek’s friend and neighbor, Mary Brown.

Huladek had heard of a murder suicide that happened in Chicago Ridge about a half mile from her home and feared she’d be next. Huladek told friends that her husband, John, had threatened her life.

“She said, ‘He’s going to shoot me’ and he did. She did everything right. She went to court. She had her brother move in for security for her and her daughter,” said Brown through tears.

That 9-year-old child was home when her mom was shot and saw the aftermath.

“She saw her mom laying there bleeding,” said Brown.

On Sunday, Brown went to John Huladek’s wake to support the young child in particular.

“Our daughters are best friends. She was in and out of their house all the time. I can’t understand that he did this,” said Brown.

Elizabeth Vitell has a good understanding of the dangers women face when relationships go bad. She’s executive director of the Rogers Park Community Council, which helps battered women. She says although Bernadette Huladek filed an order of protection, sadly such orders often fail to help.

“It’s a piece of paper. Unfortunately, some people are simply not deterred by a piece of paper,” said Vitell.

That’s why she says women who fear for their safety should contact a domestic violence agency to set up a safety plan. And above all, after having someone served with an order of protection, don’t go home.

“Everyone has a friend. Everyone has a sister, a cousin or someplace you can go. It may not seem fair, but don’t go home.

Vitell says going home can put your life at risk.

Vitell says another problem is the lack of domestic violence shelters in the city and suburbs.

Now, if you fear for your life, Vitell says call the council at 773-338-7722

Elise Nersesian-Solé
MSN
July 27th, 2010

My friend Karen is a gorgeous, tall, auburn-haired beauty with measurements that would put Barbie to shame. And although she has her pick of hot guys to choose from, she’s currently in a committed relationship with a man who’s pushing 5’6″, balding and could afford to park 15 pounds.

And she couldn’t be happier.

Their pairing is not an anomaly. All one has to do is step out onto the street or flip through a gossip rag to see a great beauty stepping out with her beast. From couples such as J. Lo and Mark Anthony, Beth Ostrosky and Howard Stern, Salman Rushdie, and well, anyone, one thing is clear: Physically-mismatched couples are everywhere.

Sure, these guys have money and power — a trait evolutionary biologists say women place great value on — yet scientists say when not accounting for these factors, these female hotties may be onto something deeper.

A recent study published in the Journal of Family Psychology suggests that for women, dating a less attractive man may result in a happier, more emotionally satisfying relationship.

Researchers from UCLA and the University of Tennessee gathered 82 couples in their mid-twenties who had married in the past year and had been together for almost three years prior, then filmed the couples discussing a personal problem. All the while, a panel of people evaluated who was the better looking individual in each pair. After analyzing the tapes, researchers discovered that in couples where the man was more attractive than the woman, he said often things such as, “This is your problem, you deal with it” whereas the unattractive hubbies were more apt to say things like, “I’m here for you — what do you want me to do? How can I help you?’”

“It’s possible that a man who is less attractive than his partner feels so grateful to be with her that he works harder to maintain the relationship, amping up the amount of emotional support and kindness he provides,” says Benjamin R. Karney, Ph.D., a professor of social psychology at UCLA. “Yet a man who is better looking than his partner knows he has lots of other options besides his mate, so he’s less committed to providing the emotional support long term relationships need to thrive.”

“In fact, among couples where the husband was the looker, both partners supported each other less,” says Karney. “That implies when the husband disengages emotionally, the wife follows suit. Then no one is happy — it’s a vicious cycle.”

Karney chalks up the relationship between a female goddess and a less beautiful man to The Social Exchange Theory: Simply put, people use a cost-benefit analysis when they think about entering or staying in a relationship. So a man might not rival Robert Pattinson in the looks department but if he’s willing to please, emotionally engaged, and loyal, a woman will probably overlook his looks when deciding to pursue him. Likewise, if a woman possesses beauty and youth but say, doesn’t earn a high income, a man will overlook that in exchange for genetically blessed offspring. Everyone brings something to the party.

And considering there’s a shortage of hot guys to go around these days, say researchers at the London School of Economics, the exchange between a lovely and a not-so-lovely works out perfectly. “An evolutionary strategy programmed into our DNA dictates that attractive people have 36 percent greater odds of having a daughter than a son,” says Satoshi Kanazawa Ph.D., a professor of management at the London School of Economics and Political Science. “Due to this evolutionary process and because physical attractiveness is highly heritable, there tends to be more beautiful women in the world than there are beautiful men.”

If nothing else, you may find that your not-so-pretty man brings his A-game in the bedroom. “What I’ve seen from my clinical practice is that women who are married to men less attractive than them often have happy sex lives most likely because their mate tries harder to please them sexually,” says Bethany Marshall, Ph.D., author of the book Deal Breakers. “And while there’s no hard data to support the theory, it makes sense that if an unattractive man has to work harder than a handsome man to stay in his relationship, he must work just as hard in the bedroom.”

Networking News
September 13th, 2009

Social media has become the playground for today’s Internet stalker, this article gives detailed information of the six types — as identified by psychologists.

A midst a high-tech virtual society, the twenty-first century has changed life for many Internet users. With popularization through mass media outlets, in early 2009, social networking has made an explosive impact on millions of users; effecting how information is gained and distributed. Social media has allowed for each globally diverse user to become his/her own media by allowing them freedom to produce content; based on their individual needs, wants, and desires. The revolution of social media has attracted millions of individuals who, before, would have never co-existed on the same medium. Social media sites such as Twitter, Digg, and Tumblr are growing rapidly — as a sign of changing times. The shocking growth on these mediums, and many similar, have produced an assorted make up of users, all in communication with each other; this expansion includes basic users, teachers, political figures, celebrities, businesses, and beyond. These users are without limitations; coming from all age groups, races, sexes, social classes, and locations. With public pages becoming increasingly popular and technology use increasing, the door has also opened for the negative behaviors of the Internet stalker. Safely from his/her own home these stalkers act to call distress to their victim(s), often using anonymity. Internet stalkers exhibit familiar patterns in their behaviors, acting out due to some type of rejection, jealousy, or criticism; the action of abandonment also feed the stalkers’ obsession, with the victim, and most commonly turn the stalkers rage into a motive of anger. The stalker, usually a loner who is socially inept in today’s society, will harass their victim(s) through a variety of unwanted and obsessive contact; such as messages, emails, comments, and even gifts. Linked with mental illnesses, psychologists has grouped the new-age Internet stalker into six specific categories –- each with unique differences.

Type One – The Delusional Stalker – These Internet stalkers have a history of mental illnesses, usually untreated, such as schizophrenia, manic depression, or borderline personality disorder; but are not limited to a single psychological illness. Delusional stalkers are often in denial of their mental illnesses, which can manifest for a variety of reasons, and even profess to others they do not have any type of mental illness — this is done, as a method of attention seeking, so to appear normal to society. Their stalking and harassment are evidently reflective of their preexisting mental disorders. For example: The delusional stalker may freely talk about hearing voices, have abnormal beliefs of concrete facts, form love to hate relationships with friends, fail to understand the needs of others, or profess their normalcy when a mental illness is mentioned.

Type Two – The Intimate Stalker – These Internet stalkers are the most common of the six defined types. The intimate stalker cannot accept that his/her relationship has ended and begin to stalk the partner through the Internet. The victim usually has no knowledge they are being stalked, and when they do the stalking has intensified. The intimate stalker believes that the stalking attempts, professed love, bullying, threats, or public shame will harm the partner or win back the affection of that partner. These stalkers do not think rationally but with a wounded heart and are most commonly female; but males can also be intimate stalkers as well. Intimate Internet stalkers resort to upping their harassment tactics when their victim(s) communicate with other people; such as friends, new love interests, or those of the same sexual orientation; in most cases these individuals are also harassed, threatened, shamed, and warned to keep away by the stalker.

Type Three – The Vengeful Stalker – The most dangerous and destructive types of Internet stalker are known, to mental health professionals, as the vengeful stalker. These Internet stalkers should be considered dangerous as they are more apt to take their online obsessions to real world form. The vengeful stalker are not limited to obsessive stalking techniques, profane bullying, or sexually explicit harassment. Operating with the motive to cause misery to the victim, this type of stalker may act to publicly shame or create falsifications to assassinate the character of the victim; these actions may also pin the victim against friends and family. Vengeful stalkers take it upon themselves to gain personal information at no cost, living in unclean conditions, failing to function in real life, of living on quick fix foods; during this time the stalker may stay up for days, disregard their responsibilities, ignore others, disregard household duties, and stop bathing. Personal information is priceless to this type of Internet stalker, acting with revenge they may befriend the victim’s friends and family members to gain intimate details of the victim; or breech computer security to gain Internet Provide (IP) address. Depending on the skill, a single IP address may reveal the exact location and real name of the victim; leading to a real life obsession to be formed. This type is most commonly linked to crimes beyond stalking which involve kidnapping, assaults, sexually motivated crimes against children, and even murder.

Type Four – The Erotomanic Stalker – These Internet stalkers form non-existent relationships with their victim. Erotomanic stalkers, who may problems sexually, form relationships in their head; at any display of attention both positive and negative. These stalkers believe their actions, of abuse, will lead to the victim falling into love with them; and that any attention from the victim is a display of that love interest. The Erotomanic stalkers goal is to be loved, sexually fulfilled, or given attention; they may resort to violence to get their wants, desires, and needs met. These stalkers are very demanding of the victim, egotistical, and self-centered. Any communication to the victim from friends, lovers, spouces, family members, or stangers is perceived as a threat to the self created fictional relationship; usually causing a rapid increase in the stalking abuse.

Type Five – The Trolling Stalker – These Internet stalkers often post obsessively violent statements to their victims; these comments may also be controversial, irrelevant, inflammatory, and off-topic. Not to be confused with the supernatural munchkin, trolling stalkers are very abusive in their attempts to gain more creditability then that deserved. These Internet stalkers derive their self pleasures by causing harm, electronically, to their victims; and usually act without the victim’s knowledge. Trolling stalkers wish death on their victims, steal content, mimic behaviors, copy actions, and threaten; with little to no self control. The exploits of such behavior is to up the creditability of the stalker so that the stalker can point the finger and blame the victim.

Type Six – The Predatory Stalker – These Internet stalkers are classic sexual predators. The predatory stalkers are motivated by the desire for sexual gratification and power over the victim. Usually sexually deviant, this type of stalker may also have poor social skills, and lowered intelligence; they most commonly keep to themselves as sociopathic individuals and come from a troubled existence with past hardships. This type of stalker should be considered very dangerous; victims and observers are encouraged to contact local law enforcement in protection of themselves and others. Sexual predators pray on those who appear to be weaker usually females and children; and may engage in behaviors such as surveillance, monitoring Internet activities, obscene phone calls, fetishism, voyeurism, sexual masochism, sexual sadism, and/or exhibitionism. Victims to this type of Internet stalker can be a known individual or complete stranger.

Those who are avid in social networking, using it in its full growing capacity, are more likely to be stalked by today’s Internet stalker; these users may not even be aware they are at risk. Victims are encouraged, by both police and mental health professionals, not to engage the stalker in any way; these stalkers exist to only seek attention from others. Those who are victims to today’s Internet stalker should know that the stalker behaves with immatureness that cannot be reasoned with as Internet stalkers do not behave with the same morals and values of the victim. While victims may not be able to stop these vile stalkers, they do reserve the freedom of peace on the Internet. This peace can be obtained by documenting all harassment at the time of its occurrence by screen shots; also victims are encouraged to also print out all tractions as a secondary method of record keeping. These records, along with a detailed description of the abuse and time frame, should be given to the local authorities, website owner, forum moderator, or social networking support; based on the harassment. These cases will be left open and can be added to as abuse occurs; all abusive observations need to be properly reported to the case worker. If it is believed life is at risk, contact your local law enforcement immediately –- using this method it is the victim has the power over the Internet stalker

William Greathouse
True Forced Loneliness
July 5th, 2010

With the others to not be an outcast to not be made in front of by others. This ends up leading a person to not think for themselves to not be themselves but to be a follower.

This is sad but truth. So many men and women in life have to feel that they need to fit in now, when you get a man or a woman who is not fitting in and they always get turned down for a date. This person can become someone who can become desperate and will do almost anything to fit in. This is one of the biggest problems in today’s world. Because men and women, as they grow up, they need to fit in or not fit in and there is a type of emotional pressure.

The group thinking mentality leads them down the wrong road in their life to be nothing but a follower. They will do almost anything from not being themselves to not thinking for themselves and this can, and will, lead someone who is very lonely in their life to do things they would not have done otherwise. And this is not good for them in anyway at all.

And when we have a World full of Evil. The one’s who like to use others to get their wants, needs, or to go out of their way to make someone out to be a fool.

Let me give you an example, OK?

You take a man or a woman who falls into this type of a category and they get into the wrong crowd, or someone who may be after something and sees them as “an easy target.” Now this person will use the one that is being the follower to get their wants and not care at all about the person they are using.

The person they are using has already given up the right to be themselves and most of the time, they won’t “say no,” they want to fit in, they want friends, they don’t want to be alone in this situation. This is why…

So now the person that’s seeing them as a target wants something they cannot get their hands on, so they manipulate the person whom they are just using into doing this for them. Now this person sometimes find themselves breaking laws for the person who is using them. Now this person can find themselves in jail for breaking a law, or find themselves in more trouble than they even know. They would be in this situation. All in order to “fit in.”

How Far Would Unpopular High School Student Go To Try To Fit In?

So many men and women out there in our society will do this unto another person. They will lie to themselves. They will then lie to everyone around them just to keep their cover just to fit in is a must for these types of individuals. Do you see what I’m trying to say here? see…and for a man or woman who’s living a life of True Forced Loneliness can be someone who is very, very open to this as they’ve been turned down or rejected so many times in their life from multiple people of that persons opposite sex. Then either the man or woman who may live a TFL lifestyle of Forced Rejection will not want anyone to know. So in essence, they will lie and say they had this girl or this man to make themselves seem what they are not able to fit into such a crowd.

They will not talk about this most of the time with nobody. Why do you think this is the case? once again, they do not want to be made out in front of others or cut down to not be able to “fit in” to be alone will scare the hell out of a person. Because a lot of men and women alike will have a big impact in their life.

How a person handles themselves. It will lead them down a road that nobody wants to be the one fit letting others to do your thinking for you is never a good thing in anyway, but our world has become so bad that everyone thinks this way. For the person who is not fitting into a life of living True Forced Loneliness, they will end up getting themselves hurt or messing up there own lives all for one reason to not be forced into loneliness and to not be the outcast in today’s world. Everything has been turned upside down on it’s head. What is “Good” is now considered “Evil” and what is “Evil” is now considered “Good.” Everything is backwards in the Dating Scene. It’s all become all about looks, money, stats, fame, and everything else in between that has not a dam thing to do with “Real Love.”

We are in a Mindset to say, “Play The Game!” or you would hear the PUA or Pick Up Artist community leadership that a person has to “Play The Game.”

Why do you want to play mind games or lie to each other, and not care about another persons emotions and feelings? all the while a person will only care about themselves. So now open up your eyes and look around you. What you will see is many, many types of children without a father or a mother in their lives.

How many men and women relationships ever last a lifetime anymore as it was meant to be? It’s not anymore and it won’t become like this anymore until we stop “Playing The Game” and until we know that you do not have to fit into a Group Think mentality in order to be yourself.

Start taking the time to become “Friends” with someone and get to know one another for real.

How many times have you heard the man say “Getting Laid is what counts in life?” do you see what’s going on here? “Getting Laid” is all about “Getting Sex,” when life is not about sex or getting laid or playing games with your opposite sex. Think about what I’m trying to say here. A person must learn to be themselves if someone don’t like you.

Who the hell cares what people think about you?

If these people don’t like you. Then “oh well.” Nobody is the same. Nobody has the right to judge for someone else. But everyone wants to think they have the right to judge for other people.

And one more point…

Looking for somebodies flaws or faults in their life, like they don’t have any of their own. Look at how you treat another person.

WAKE THE HELL UP!!!

We are all human beings. We all have messed up in our lives, as a Global Society. Nobody is and never will be perfect in our lifetime. We all make mistakes. But we learn from them and move on. None of us. Nobody at all is free from being “the perfect human species.”

So remember this important fact. “Trying to fit into the group think mentality or crowd, is not a good thing.”

Trying to run someone else’s life leads only yourself and others around you, into a life of misery.

Start thinking for your own dam self out there…PERIOD!!!

Sincerely,
- William Greathouse

Return To The True Forced Loneliness Home And Learn More Of Hope To Cope With Rejection, Loneliness, And Dating

Please comment on True Forced Loneliness Rejection Life Love Dating How Far Would An Unpopular High School Student Go To Try To Fit In

Dedicated In Aiding Sufferers with; Isolation, Depression, Romance, Loneliness, Sadness, Rejection, Relationships.

Bill Greathouse and Dwayne Holloway
True Forced Loneliness
July 5th, 2010

Dating Tips Advise For Women Men

TFL True Forced Loneliness is a Movement We Question Give Answers Host Radio Show(s), Live Talk On Sex Porn, and the NWO New World Order Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theories.

We will be adding very soon if not already the following so subscribe to our blog today and also help us by subscribing to the feed (orange button) do both help spread hope and aid wit ha little known yet massive, and spreading condition True Forced Loneliness

SERVICES:

• Free Private Forum TFL FORUM which will be at this URL http://www.trueforcedloneliness.com/tfl
• Live Radio Show you can listen right here starting tomorrow or at our BlogtalkRadio site by looking in the left or right side bar
• Place to exchange names and numbers and free directory and classifieds to find your soul mate or just to advertise your website or business. It is up to you
• Live Chat which will allow voice audio chat and video chat public and private and regular text chat all FREE

Join William (Bill) Greathouse and Dwayne Holloway As they attack and discuss the following:

TOPICS:

• TFL True Forced Loneliness
• Loneliness
• Forced Rejection
• Dating
• Isolation
• Depression
• Sadness
• Romance
• Advise and Answers
• Pick Up Artists PUA
• NWO New World Order Conspiracy Theories
• Secret Conspiracies
• Relationships
• Any Scam or Scams
• True Love
• Propaganda
• Brainwashing or Brain Washing
• Mainstream Media and News
• Sex Porn XXX
• Online Dating or Dates
• Dating Tips
• Your Questions
• Women and Men Issues

Return to Main TFL TRUE FORCED LONELINESS